Sunday, April 28, 2013

Learning Theories

Reigeluth's Elaboration Theory

It provides a macro prescriptive framework for selecting, sequencing, synthesizing, and summarizing the content.

Principles:
1) Instruction should be organized in increasing order of complexity for optimal learning
2) The learner needs to develop a meaningful context into which subsequent ideas and skills can be assimilated
3) Sequencing strategies may be topical or spiral

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Algo-Hueristic Theory

The theory suggests that all cognitive activities can be analyzed into operations of an algorithm, semi-algorithm, heuristic, and semi-heuristic nature. Once discovered, these operations and their systems can serve as the basis for instructional strategies and methods. The theory specifies that students ought to be taught not only knowledge but the algorithms and heuristics of experts as well. They also have to be taught how to discover algorithms and heuristics on their own.

Principles
3. Teaching students how to discover processes is more valuable than providing them already formulated
4. Break processes down to elementary operations of size and length suitable for each student

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

David Ausubel: Meaningful Verbal Learning & Subsumption Theory

Meaning is created through some form of representation equivalence between language (symbols) and mental  context. Two processes are involved:
1) Reception, which is employed in meaningful verbal learning
2) Discovery, which is involved in concept formation and problem solving

His theory emphasis on the learning methods of speech, writing, and writing.

To subsume is to incorporate new material into one's cognitive structures. This existing structure provides a framework into which the new learning is related, hierarchically, to previous information or concepts

When one encounters completely new unfamiliar material, then rote learning, as opposed to meaning leaning takes place. Rote learning can be used to construct meaning learning later. Think of religious rituals. As a child, you do them but do not understand them. As you get older, you start to understand the meaning, purpose and symbolism of such rituals.

Two types of subsumption:
1) Correlative subsumpation - new material is an extension or elaboration of what is already known
2) Derivative subsumpation - new material or relationships can be derived from the existing structure

Ausubel is a proponent of didactic, expository learning methods. From this perspective, expository (verbal) learning approaches encourage rapid learning and retention, whereas discovery learning (Bruner) facilitates transfer to other contexts.

Ausubel believed that it was important for teachers to provide a preview of information to be learned (advanced organizer). This would enable students to start with a "Big Picture" of the upcoming content, and link new ideas, concepts, vocabulary to existing mental maps of the content area.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jerome Bruner - Spiral Curriculum

 Bruner believed that the curriculum should continually revisit basic ideas, building upon them incrementally and making links and connections between them until the pupil has grasped full understanding.

He proposed that the starting point of learning should be what learners already know, believe, and can do already.

The importance of "play" - which is leaning by doing

With a spiral approach, connections between the things encountered earlier and later are made clear. More important for pupils to have an intuitive grasp of the subject rather than knowing the proper terms or formulas.

Teachers should help student learn to think intuitively by guessing. Teachers need to build pupil's self-confidence because such thinking requires a willingness to make mistakes.

The importance of presenting children with ideas and challenges that are not too far from their natural way of thinking.

Children may forget facts but making connections will help them to work things out for themselves.

Making connections enables the transfer to take place. There are two kinds of transfer:
1) Learning a skill
2) Learning a general idea that can be used as a basis for recognizing subsequent problems as variations of the original idea

Bruner advocated children learning through personal discovery rather than passive receivers of information.

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

Teaching History - Lessons, Units, Activities, Books, and Web Links

http://www.thecaveonline.com/APEH/dbqhowto.html


A GUIDE TO WRITING A DBQ

The purpose of the DBQ (Document Based Question) is not to test your knowledge of the subject, but rather to evaluate your ability to practice the historian's craft. You will be required to work with the documents and use them to answer a question.
Writing the DBQ is an acquired skill, one that takes practice. You should not get discouraged if you do not "get it" right away. The goal is to acquire the skill by May.
Remember that there is actually no right or wrong answer. Your answer is YOUR interpretation of the content of the documents. As long as your answer is logical and your interpretation is supported by the content of the document you are correct.
The following is your guide to writing a successful DBQ.

HISTORICAL CONCERNS

1. Read carefully the question prompt and the historical background. Underline the tasks demanded and the terms which are unique to the question.
2. Read the documents carefully.
a. Make sure that you understand the content of the document.
b. What is the author's Point of View (POV).
c. Where is the tension?
1. Are there people from the same place with differing POV?
2. Is a Frenchman critiquing the French or is it an Englishman? Which is biased, which has great knowledge?
d. What is the origin of the document?
e. Is the document valid or is it hearsay?
f. If time, gender or age were changed would the person be saying the same thing?
3. You should strive to use most of the document (omitting no more than 1 or two).
4. Do not simply site the documents in "laundry list" fashion. You should strive to IMPOSE order on the documents. Find groupings for the documents. Can they be organized into a format? What is the OVERALL picture presented by the documents. Can you use the documents implicitly?
5. Your essay should be an ANALYSIS of the documents and their content.You are demonstrating analysis if you are doing the following:
a. The essay contains a thesis which divides your answer into categories.
b. The documents are used as evidence to support your thesis.
c. Frequent reference is made to the terms of the question. Be certain that your answer is always focused directly on the question. Do not drift afield.
6. Be certain that, if the question allows, you exploit all of the following in writing your answer.
a. Point of View (POV) is both indicated and discussed from several angles.
b. The Validity (VAL) of documents is noted.
c. Change Over Time (COT) is recognized and discussed (if this occurs in the documents)
d. Did the pendulum of history swing in the chronological course of the documents? Did it swing back again?

LITERARY CONCERNS
1. The essay has an adequate introduction in which the time frame is noted.
2. The thesis provides an answer to the question and divides the answer into categories.
3. Proper essay style is used (think 5 paragraph format where applicable).
4. Grammar and spelling are adequate (do not misspell words that are supplied in the documents).
5. You have not referred to yourself in the essay and you have not told the readers what they are "going to learn".
6. A great majority of the documents have been used in a manner which makes their use readily apparent to the reader.
7. Quotations are limited to a phrase which is placed within the context of your answer.
8. ALL PARTS OF THE QUESTION have been answered.
9. A conclusion exists which summarizes the evidence, restates the thesis and indicates a direction for further study or occurrences.
10. Base all of your comments on the documents, NOT on outside information. Outside information may be used to enhance understanding but it must not be the basis of your argument.

.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.flowofhistory.com/units/etc/20/FC135

The Flow of History method 

Excellent graphs!

Sunday, April 21, 2013

Differentiated Instruction



Three ways
-- Presentation (How it is taught)
    -- whole class or student centered
         -- whole class instruction
         -- small group instruction
         -- stations
         -- cooperative groups
-- Process (How it is done)
-- Product (How to demonstrate knowledge)

Direct Instruction (some visual, some auditory, some kinthestic) 
-- traditional lecture
-- alternative note-taking
-- manipulatives
-- small groups

Process
-- traditional pencil/paper
-- cooperative groups (different ability groups, help each other)
-- stations
-- compacting (for advanced students to move on to other topics)
-- independent contracts (ELL, special education, IEP, gate enrichment activity)
-- choice opportunities (listening station, work with a partner, work silently)

Product
-- traditional assessments (some do 5 problems, some do 10 problems)
-- written reports/papers
-- art/video projects
-- oral reports/presentations
-- PowerPoint presentations
-- Skits/Songs/Dances

Managing 
-- Decide what to teach
     -- content, standards, outcomes
-- Pre-assess to determine existing knowledge/needs
-- Create groupings
    -- ability groupings (remediation, enrichment)
    -- cooperative groups (project-based, problem-based)

Preparation
-- Materials
-- Directions
-- Noise levels
-- Student Movement
-- Room Arrangement
-- Teacher Assistance
-- Monitoring of Students

Expectations
-- establish behavior norms
-- train the students
-- build in accountability for both groups and individual students
-- assess and reflect

Start small and do it really well

Monday, October 8, 2012

English Language Learners - Stephen Cary

The following is from a good book by Stephen Cary called "English Language Learners, Answers to Teachers' Top Ten Questions, 2nd Edition"

Find useful information on a student's cultural background
  • primary language and dialects
  • home countries
  • city vs rural background
  • L1 and L2 oral proficiency levels
  • L1 and L2 literacy levels
  • partial verses proficient (balanced) bilinguals
  • multilingual students
  • language spoken at home (or per family history)

How can I make my spoken language more understandable

  • enhanced read-loud
  • video preview
  • story action walk-through
  • objects
  • power words
  • page/paragraph summarizing
  • paraphrases
  • picture-based book response
  • primary language support material
  • student spin-off stories
How do I get my reluctant speakers to speak English
  • incorporate student interests
  • making content engaging
  • favoring authentic talk over compliance talk
  • emphasize fluency over accuracy
  • help students know when and when not to listen to "editing crow"
  • students share orally with a pair buddy or small group instead of the whole class
  • students talk through a puppet or role-play character
  • configuring furniture for student-to-student talk
  • paying attention to students' affective needs
  • never forcing L2 production
  • encourage use of second and first languages
  • doing more collaborative activities
  • reducing teacher talk
How do I make a difficult textbook more readable

  • think-out-loud modeling
  • highlighted text
  • context clues
  • objects, pantomime, movement
  • tapping students' prior knowledge
  • encourage spin-off stories
  • personal teacher stories
  • signposts to the main ideas
  • pair reading
  • L1 summaries
  • note-taking via graphic organizers and drawings
 
 

Friday, August 24, 2012

Education Vocabulary


authentic assessment 
  1. requires a real or simulated audience, purpose, setting, and options for personalizing the work, realistic constraints, and "background noise".  

project-based learning
  1. a process in which students solve interesting problems and then use what they learn to create something new 
making content accessible
  1. Vary instructional strategies according to purpose and lesson content
  2. Reinforce content in multiple ways 
    • written presentation
    • oral presentation
    • manipulatives
    • physical models
    • visual and performing arts
    • diagrams
    • non-verbal communications
    • computer technology
  
effective hooks
  1. Immediately grabs students attention and helps them connect with the content
  2. Effective Methods
    • posing a question
    • sharing a book
    • storytelling
    • using guided imagery
    • analyzing art or photograph
    • exploring artifacts
    • presenting an event
    • ask students to give an opinion on an issue or problem
heuristic
  1. Immediately enabling a person to discover or learn something for themselves
  2. Problem-solving by experimental and especially trial-and-error methods
  3. Immediately process of gaining knowledge or some desired result by intelligent guesswork rather than following some pre-established formula


Thursday, July 26, 2012

Making Adaptations for English Learners

From: Andrea M. Guillaume, Jennifer Ponder, Lynda R. Wil (2012-01-06). CalTPA Preparation Guide. Pearson. Kindle Edition. 


For estimating the student’s level of English proficiency if no CELDT score is available: 


•  Interview the student.
•  Listen to the student’s spoken language in informal settings.
•  Listen to the student use English in a variety of academic contexts
such as partner talk, small-group work, and in front of the class.
Remember that speaking before a large group of people is stressful; stress can affect language usage.
•  Examine the student’s written language.
•  Talk with the student’s parents, either in English, the home language, or through an interpreter.
•  If you have a master teacher, ask for advice.
•  Interview other teachers or personnel who know the student.
•  Check student records.

Five Principles


1.   Build a supportive environment.
   •   Use classroom routines and provide an orderly learning
environment.
  •   Learn about students and incorporate their cultures and interests.
  •   Use culturally relevant examples.
  •   Focus on communication and help students feel free to take risks
as they practice their language.  
2.   Keep a clear focus on the content and on language development.
   •   Choose content carefully; focus on developing key ideas well.
  •   State the objective.
  •   Connect to prior knowledge.
  •   Explicitly teach vocabulary for basic communication and for academic English.
  •   Teach vocabulary well by focusing on meaningful development, varied instruction, and multiple opportunities to practice. 
  •   Teach English sentence structures, grammar, and idioms.
  •   Preview/review.
  •   Check for understanding.
  •   Focus on higher-level thinking and teach learning strategies.
  •   Maximize student engagement with the content.  
3.   Provide a rich learning environment. 
   •   Embed content in meaningful contexts.
  •   Connect content to real-life and prior experiences.
  •   Create a print-rich environment.
  •   Use real objects (realia) and manipulatives.
  •   Use pictures and video.
  •   Employ digital technologies.
  •   Use guest speakers and field trips.
  •   Provide input that is kinesthetic, linguistic, organizational, and visual.  
4.   Make your input comprehensible. 
   •   Use caregiver speech. Think of how parents talk with children
as they learn their first language and adopt some of those patterns, as appropriate for your student’s age and development.
Examples include simpler nouns, exaggerated intonation, and a
focus on the “here and now” so the context provides clear hints
about meaning,
  •   Simplify speech. Slow down, use fewer figures of speech, use repetition, and use gestures to clarify meaning.
  •   Use multiple forms of input. Don’t just say directions aloud; put
them on a chart that includes both words and drawings.
  •   Simplify text. For example, provide outlines, highlight passages,
rewrite it, or use materials adapted for different readability levels.
  •   Provide primary language support (e.g., texts in the native
language) as appropriate.
  •   Use computer-based technologies, perhaps in the

•   Scaffold. For example, break text into small chunks, paraphrase,
and model think-aloud procedures.  
5.   Increase structured student interaction. 
   •   Build in regular, structured time for students to practice their content knowledge and English (orally and in writing).
  •   Use a variety of grouping strategies: mixed-language for exposure
to native speakers; same-language for opportunities to develop
content knowledge.
  •   Use active participation devices such as thumbs up/thumbs down,
white boards, and unison response for frequent assessment and
engagement.
  •   Use wait time. Pause for three to five seconds before calling on
a student to respond to your question. Pause again before you
respond.
  •   Use the 10:2 rule. For every ten minutes of input, give two minutes
of processing.
  •   Use cooperative learning strategies that structure peer talk.
Examples include:
   •    Turn to your neighbor.  At a few points during your lesson, ask
students to discuss a brief problem, question, or opinion with a
person sitting next to them.
  •    Numbered heads together.  Place students in groups and number
each group member, e.g., 1–4. Require each group to discuss your
question and then call on a number. That member represents the
group by sharing the group’s thinking with the entire class.
  •    Think-Pair-Share.  Ask a question, then provide “think time.”
Have partners next discuss their thinking. Finally, ask them to
share with the class.
  •    Seasonal partners.  Have students sign up with four partners—
one for each season. At a few points during your lesson, ask students to discuss with one of their assigned partners.
  •    Peer tutoring.  Use same-age, cross-age, or cross-expertise partners to help students master the content.
  •    Dialogue journals.  Have students write in journals to each
other.      
 Use  You Try It! Appropriate Practices for English Learners: Thumbs





Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Assessment and feedback strategies

From: http://www.ljmu.ac.uk/lid/ltweb/88206.htm


A guide to writing a Feedback Strategy

The following pointers to writing a feedback strategy arise from the work done by the Assessment Review Working Group. The guide also incorporates many of the ideas suggested by Phil Race in his workshop of 20th November 2000. It is intended that the headings and suggestions are helpful, not as a template that must be used. Please feel free to add, delete or completely ignore this.
The Academic Board on 4th June 2001 agreed that there should be an appropriate balance of diagnostic, formative and summative feedback programmes. Programme teams/Schools are to decide their own feedback strategy within University guidelines.

What is a feedback strategy?

A collection of tactics that work in a given situation. ‘Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler’. Einstein.
Who is the strategy for?
  • Students
  • Staff - School, programme, and module staff
  • QAA
Key questions that a feedback strategy should address:
  • What is feedback and why bother?
  • How does feedback enhance learning?
  • Does the strategy cover all assessed tasks? Has there been a consideration of providing feedback on non assessed work?
  • What methods can we use?
  • What messages do we give as a result of feedback given?
  • Who should give the feedback?
  • When should feedback be given?
  • Can feedback be given on an individual basis? Should it be written?
  • What is the role of students in the process?
  • Ownership and compliance
  • How does our teaching and learning practice facilitate feedback?
  • Will you be able to convince the QAA and others that you are doing all you say you are doing?


Possible headings:

1. What is feedback and why bother?

Everyone likes to know how he or she is doing. We all like praise and most people don’t like working in a vacuum. At a minimal level feedback provides a reference point for students. Students become demotivated if they get no information about how they are doing. Staff usually like to provide lots of feedback but feel hard pressed when large numbers are involved. Nevertheless feedback influences student learning and can be very motivating or very demotivating depending on its nature, scope, and timing. The strategy need to defines the types of feedback that programmes and modules intend to use in order to provide feedback that enhances student learning rather than just giving students information, or marks, about their performance. Are there any types of assessment where staff cannot provide feedback?
Diagnostic feedback would follow diagnostic assessment of some kind that is ideally carried out before, or at the start of a programme/module. In this way the abilities and knowledge base of each student could be identified before formal study begins.

Formative feedback is concerned with helping students improve. It should provide guidance and be motivating however awful the work.
Ipsative feedback is where students are assessed against their own previous performance and feedback is provided in terms of the improvement made to their skills, knowledge and competence since the last time they were assessed on the subject. Is any feedback provided that serves an ipsative function?
Summative feedback is primarily provided to students to give marks / comments on their attainment. Summative feedback may have a formative function such as providing comments on examination or essay technique, which may help a student in subsequent examinations.

Reference - Information about the different types of feedback can be found in ‘Assessment Matters in Higher Education’, Brown, S. and Glasner, A.. eds (1999), SRHE and O.U. Press and ‘Assessing Students: How shall we know them?’ Rowntree D., (1987), Kogan Page.


2. What methods can we use?

Will the methods adopted vary according to the type of assessment, the level of the students, the numbers of students, the nature of the feedback? Should there be written feedback for all assessed activities/at least once per module? What is the role of oral feedback? Is it acceptable for module leaders to choose their own format of feedback? Does the programme team know how feedback is given, and when, across the programme? What are the advantages and disadvantages of different types of feedback? For staff, for students? For example, oral feedback may be quicker but students have selective memories. Do the teaching and learning methods adopted provide opportunities for feedback as part of the delivery of the module?

Some suggestions:

Instant feedback

  •  In class quizzes or questions
  • Computer based tests
  • Post it note feedback - Ask anonymously if preferred, on post its, as they leave or at the end of the session - What have I learnt from this session? What was the main point? What do I need to do to make the most of this session/ to reinforce the session? What was the main point left unanswered? What was the point of this session? What do I want to find out next week? Or at the start of the session — what do I expect to find out today?
  • Ask a student to summarise the session at the end. Ask others to comment on his/her summary
  • During the session ask them to think about/write down/ tell a neighbour what the previous few minutes have been about. Ask them to formulate a question on the topic — see if their neighbour can response — collect in questions, comments, answers — useful for feedback.
  • Depending on the response more work may have to be done at the beginning of the next session or further exercises/material given to students who need or request them.

Assignment feedback

  • Feedback sheets — examples attached
  • Electronic feedback — Phil Denton’s software
  • Other computerised statement banks or reports
  • Provide module answers, or exemplars of good, poor and indifferent answers
  • Before assignment is handed in - Ask students what is required of this topic — what is the marker looking for
  • Class exercises — mark past/similar papers why is this a good/poor answer
  • Ask students to develop assessment criteria
  • Get students to mark each other’s outlines/planning/summaries of assignments
  • Ask students what they expect from feedback
  • Ask students to mark/comment on their own assignment (or their peers)—before /as they hand it in and to justify the mark — ask them to consider whether they have met the requirements — but need to know them in advance — offer a few marks for this?
Some suggestions:
  • Individual by appointment
  • Group — examiner’s comments sent to whole group with or without exemplar answers. The students would get numerical marks only but the report would indicate how many people attempted each question, the average, maximum and minimum marks, what constituted a good and poor answer, common errors, omissions etc. Comments should include something about examination technique.
  • Provide students with a detailed marking scheme
  • Individual written comments
Reference: ‘Enhancing Student Learning’ SEDA Special 10, Phil Race


3. When should feedback be given?

Feedback should be timely. Timeliness will vary according to the purpose of the assessment. Feedback on diagnostic assessment needs to be given straightaway. Feedback on exams does not. Programmes need to give students a timescale by which they can expect feedback.


4. How does the feedback provided enhance learning?

The QAA Code of Practice, Assessment of Students, Precept 12: ‘Institutions should ensure that appropriate feedback is provided to students on assessed work in a way that promotes learning and facilitates improvement’. The Assessment Review Working Group wants to encourage more formative assessment and feedback and is encouraging programme teams to consider ways of providing more useful feedback to students.
There is evidence to suggest that feedback is at its most effective in promoting student learning where the feedback is not linked to marks or grades*. Feedback can be provided within sessions and made integral to teaching and learning. It is too late if left to the end of the module if it is to be effective in improving learning within that module. Students need to be able to understand the lecturer’s comments, whether oral or written. Thus in feedback which is timetabled into the sessions for the module there are more opportunities to check for understanding and to give students the chance to discuss assessment criteria, past answers etc than solely using feedback that occurs after the student has completed an assignment or examination. Consider whether it is possible to give back work with comments but without marks. If marks are required keep them yourself and return work without them but invite the students to estimate their own marks from your comments. This should encourage students to read the comments and will also identify students whose perception is very different from yours.
Reference - Black P. and Wiliam D. ‘Inside the black box: raising standards through classroom assessment’, Kings College, London (1998)


5. Good, poor and indifferent feedback:

Improvements in student learning will only come about if the feedback given is of good quality. There are many ways of providing feedback. See section 3 for examples of methods.

Effective feedback:

  • Is timely. Effective feedback could range from immediate to several weeks after the assessment and still be timely and effective.
  • provides insight into misunderstandings, errors, lack of techniques etc.
  • provides guidance about how the student may improve - information is given about how students may improve their performance, not just for those who are weak but for all students. For example if a student is in the 2.1 category what could this student do to achieve a first class mark?
  • is positive — especially at the start and finish of any comments. The language used is clear and cannot be construed as patronising.
  • checks understanding regularly
  • avoids ‘final language’ (Boud, 1994) which brooks no argument. If work is described as ‘appalling’ or ‘brilliant’ it is difficult to move beyond that description, and improve
  • provides examples of good and bad work with your feedback comments
  • provides opportunities for discussion of feedback in a supportive and developmental environment, where possible, in class
  • is legible, avoids unknown abbreviations, codes, notation that isn’t necessarily obvious, such as ?? marks against a paragraph. Does more than just ticks and crosses. A short comment is more enlightening than a cross or tick.
  • is realistic, suggestions for improvement are obtainable and unambiguous
  • gives reasons and explanations for comments, where possible
  • ensures that feedback relates directly and primarily to the assessment criteria
  • is given for all assessed work
  • is ideally focussed on the individual.
Reference — ‘2000 Tips for Lecturers’, Phil Race, Kogan Page, 2000
Section 10, Feedback to Students, from ‘Enhancing Student Learning’, SEDA Special 10, Phil Race


6. Transparency:

Programmes should identify a feedback strategy. This should be explained in programme documentation and module handbooks. Students should be informed about what is expected of them and what they can expect in return in terms of feedback. Will feedback be accompanied by the return of assessed work? Are there any occasions when feedback may not be appropriate (e.g. between an exam and a MAB). These should also be specified (at the start of a module?). There should be a balance between diagnostic, formative and summative assessment.

Ideas suggested:
  • Moderate module handbooks to ensure information is provided and consistency of approach
  • Discuss with students what they expect/would like from feedback — discuss proposals, misconceptions, unrealistic expectations
  • Provide exemplars of what they are likely to receive — e.g. feedback sheets, statement banks, the purpose of model answers, discuss self-assessment, and peer assessment/feedback

Discuss with other markers:

  • criteria and marking schemes
  • interpretation of criteria - if possible on a staff development day — do some kind of marking exercise and discuss differences — how could these be resolved — discuss interpretations of grades, use of language exercise that could be used — Concorde essay from Phil Race, economics exercise from Chris Mulhearn, statements exercise from Phil Race workshop


7. Workload

How will the programme stop the requirement for feedback from becoming another bureaucratic task imposed on staff? Are there likely to be any unintended side effects of feedback — e.g. will a series of small assessment tasks change into a portfolio in order to avoid giving feedback on each task?
Ideas suggested:
  • Use more in-class feedback 
  • Use more student and peer feedback 
  • ask staff and students to complete workload charts /assessment mapping/ feedback charts and analyse and act accordingly 
  • map assessment loads and reduce assessment 
  • stagger deadlines 
  • provide a timetable of assessment across a programme 
  • incorporate self reflection — perhaps allocate some marks for this 
  • computerised statement banks or reports
Reference Clare Milsom, BES, assessment mapping software package, and Phil Denton’s electronic feedback package


8. Ownership, compliance and implementation:

How widely has the strategy been discussed within the programme/School? What staff development is necessary? Has there been any student involvement in the development of the strategy? Do staff understand what it means to them or is it a policy document to be filed away? Is there an action plan to implement changes? Are there priorities? Does staff development need to be considered as a separate heading?


9. Evaluation and Quality Assurance:

What procedures and processes are in place to ensure the quality of feedback at programme and module level? Are there mechanisms for disseminating good practice and for discovering and acting on concerns? How can the programme/School ensure that its staff are competent in providing feedback? What procedures are in place to review and amend the strategy? Will it be a working document within the School?
A good strategy should be:
  • Clear, user friendly, jargon free and understandable by staff and students
  • Realistic, able to be implemented
  • Free of bias
  • Adaptable
  • Internally consistent and ensuring that all programme teams adhere to its principles
  • A tool for improving current practice, providing examples of good practice
  • Encouraging diversity
  • Easy to administer
  • Discussed with colleagues and students
  • Regularly reviewed
  • Consistent with the QAA code
  • Able to enhance learning
All reference materials are available from the Learning Development Team, e-mailc.connor@livjm.ac.uk or telephone 3187. A number of the articles are in the yellow workshop material pack that was given out at the Phil Race workshops.


Other useful books:

Ramsden, P. ‘Learning to Teach in Higher Education’, (1992) Routledge, pages 193 — 197.

Fry, H. Ketteridge, S and Marshall, S eds ‘A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education’, (1999) Kogan Page Chapters 5 and 6.

Pat Eastwood,
Learning Development Team,
June 2001.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Formative Assessments

http://wvde.state.wv.us/teach21/ExamplesofFormativeAssessment.html



Observations

Questioning

Discussion

Exit/Admit Slips

Learning/Response Logs

Graphic Organizers

Peer/Self Assessments

Practice Presentations

Visual Representations

Kinesthetic Assessments

Individual Whiteboards

Laundry Day

Four Corners

Constructive Quizzes

Think Pair Share

Appointment Clock

As I See It


 

Links to Examples of Formative Assessments:

Types of Formative Assessment
eHow: Types of Formative Assessment

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wiggins, G & McTighe J. (1998) Understanding by Design

Authentic assessment requires a real or simulated audience, purpose, setting, and options for personalizing the work, realistic constraints, and "background noise"